Susanne Posel Apr 20th, 2012
Lawyers for the Obama Administration announced that Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate was a forgery. Under penalty of perjury, the lawyers said they were forced to say that the birth certificate was valid.Occupy Corporatism
April 20, 2012
A lawyer representing the Obama administration say the birth certificate was knowingly purveyed to fool the American public into believing he was legitimately able to be President.
However, they purport that Obama knows he is not a natural born citizen.
Obama stated at a White House briefing that the birth certificate subject is “irrelevant”. He must think that by dismissing it that he can make it go away.
This invalidates the Obama Presidency and makes him ineligible to be President in 2012.
Pen Johannson, Editor of the Daily Pen, stated in his editorial that this controversy should set off a firestorm of constitutional questions and a legislative controversy of epic proportions.
In New Jersey, a case about Obama’s eligibility has influenced activist to question the President’s legal right to be Commander and Chief.
Alexandra M. Hill, representative defense attorney for Obama made comments that brought the Tea Party members to question the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate.
Nick Purpura of Wall Township, NJ, and Ted Moran of Toms River, NJ, filed their objection with the New Jersey Board of Elections. Purpura and Moran objected to Obama ( :)) appearing on the June 5 Democratic Primary ballot on two grounds:
• No one knows exactly who Barack H. Obama is, because he has had three different names in life. Furthermore, he has never furnished a true copy of his birth certificate to the Secretary of State. So no one can be sure that Obama was born in the United States.
• Obama’s father was a British colonial subject. He not only was not a naturalized citizen on the alleged date of Obama’s birth, but indeed never sought naturalization. Therefore Obama could never be a natural-born citizen no matter where he was born.
Attorney for the plaintiff, Mario Apuzzo asserts that the birth certificate is the proof of Oba... that allows him to be on the ballot in New Jersey.
On April 10, 2012, these lawyers admitted to the forgery.
Even Obama is asserting that the document is a fake and should not be allowed into evidence.
And the judge in this case agrees.
By this admission, Barack Obama can be charged with High Crimes and Misdemeanors by lying to the American public about his legitimacy as President. Obama is guilty to criminal activity and blatantly ineligible for Presidency and the electoral process this year.
Without the birth certificate, Obama cannot prove he is a natural born citizen. Where before this development, the Obama administration adamantly asserted that the birth certificate was legitimate; they knowing lied and therefore should be arrested and charged with their illegal actions against the American people.
Obama’s lawyers met with Attorney Mario Apuzzo after this story begun to leak out. They intend to have the videos of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge public hearing removed and suppressed.
The Obama administration does not want this information known to the public and are trying to preform damage control as this story is shared across the internet.
Watch video from the NJ public hearings here.
Could it be that all this birth certificate controversy is just a distraction? ._.
I guess it could be, but the thing is people have been going after him about this for years now. So it would of been a couple year distraction. I don't know either way... but i do know from being a graphic artist, that there's all sorts of things that look wrong with the birth certificate they posted for all too see. Its been doctored without a doubt. Does that mean he doesn't have another real one somewhere?... i don't know. But it took them 2 years to even post that one. I would think that's one of the first things they check before making someone a President of the United States.
They did check. He has a certificate of live birth which is a legal document issued by the state. Long form birth certificates are rare unless you are in your 70's or live in a state that still issues "Birth Certificates." It is an issue of syntax and really has no legal differences between the two.